Meeting Agenda FAA/Aviation Industry

OpSpec Working Group (OSWG) 2004-01

January 21 (Tuesday, 1 pm-5 pm)/22 (Wednesday, 8:30-noon), 2004

American Airlines Flight Academy in Dallas January 20-21.

 

Courtesy shuttle is provided from the Embassy Suites (972-790-0093) to the AA Flight Academy at 4601 S. Hwy. 360, Ft. Worth and to DFW airport.

 

Meeting Schedule/Location

 

January 20-21, 2004

American Airlines – Dallas

April 27-28, 2004

ATA – Washington, DC--

July 20-21, 2004

COMAIR – Cincinnati

October 19-20, 2004

Washington, DC

 

Topic

 

 

1.        Convene                                                              Chairpersons

Roll call

Review, amend and adopt agenda

 

2.   NEW VICE CHAIRMAN – Nominations/Election………………              Chairpersons

 

3.  Status of Assigned Action Items                                        Chairpersons

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.  OpSpec B343, Fuel Reserves in International Operations

 

Background:   OpSpec B043 allows for a deviation to the fuel reserve requirements for international flight operations. 

 

FAA Lead = AFS-200 (Jerry Ostronic)/AFS Dispatch Specialists
Industry Lead – Jim Johnson, AA

 

Desired Outcome:   American Airlines has requested further reduction in the fuel reserve requirements for international flight operations.

 

Action/Outcome:  It was suggested that we do not change the OpSpec but consider updating the guidance to suggest that a demo may need to be done if a ditching demo has never been done.

 

 

5.  OpSpec C089/C090/C052, RNP RNAV Instrument Approaches

 

Background:    The Industry leads suggested and provided example of providing RNAV RNP approach authorization as a selectable item in paragraph C052.

 

FAA Lead = AFS-410/AFS-200

Industry Lead = Jim Enias, ATA/Jackson Seltzer, Continental

 

Desired Outcome:  Need standard authorization for RNAV RNP approaches .

 

Action/Outcome:  AFS-410 answer:  I have three major problems with the proposed OpSpec C052.

 

1. The added items (4) through (8) do not appear to replace or even closely resemble the authorizations of C089/C090.

2. The approaches added in the tables under a. do not exist to my knowledge.

RNAV (GPS) approaches are the only approaches that I know of. I have never seen any  RNAV(RNP) approaches. Way back, when we started to work on this RNP and RNP RNAV project I remember this being discussed as an option for procedure naming, but to my knowledge it never matured.

3. Manually loading waypoints to construct procedures is against current policy as I know it.

Modifying airspeeds, altitudes, or RNP values at waypoints may be an option of some FMS systems, but procedures being built by manual entry of waypoints, even by name, is not safe.

Rich Gastrich, AFS-410

4.  Order 8260.51 is being developed by the TOARC for the STAARS for RNP approach development.

 

6.  OpSpec A062, Parabolic Flight Operations (new)

Background:   ZERO-G, Planet Earth’s First Spaceline requested guidance and authorization to conduct “parabolic” flight operations using a Boeing 727.  ZERO-G has and STC to introduce interior changes in the modification for carriage of passengers. 

 

Industry Lead = ?

FAA Lead = AFS-200

 

Desired Outcome:  The FAA desires to work with this operator and develop standard guidance and authorization to conduct Parabolic Flights.

 

Action/Outcome:  Guidance and OpSpec A062 are in development as a standard authorization.

 

 

7.  OpSpec C059, CAT II Approach Authorization

Background:

a.  Jackson Seltzer (CAL) to provide update/report on questions raised regarding the question of lighting equivalents, i.e. allowing a CAT II using MALSR.  The final draft of updates to 8400.10 for CAT II all weather operations, the revision to paragraph C059, and the new OpSpec C359 available on opspecs.com and will be reviewed and discussed.

b.  An official revision to C059, CAT II, was published with an ambiguity in the airport/runway authorized.

c.  Steve Kuhar (FEDEX) stated that he was confused about the language in subparagraph b(1)(a)(i)—Required 6-6-6RVR Fail Passive—No Rollout.—The confusion is that:  Rollout cannot be inop but can be zero if rollout is inop, cannot make approach. Dick Temple, AFS-410, explained that the other 2 RVR are controlling for the fail passive; he advised that we review the RVR order and AC to see what they say in regard to “Operative” since that is the language for relevant RVR.

 

Industry Lead = Jackson Seltzer

FAA Lead = AFS-410/AFS-200

 

Desired Outcome:

a.  Determine if MALSR is sufficient for CAT II operations. Clarify language and/or guidance for 6-6-6 inop. 

b.   Correct discrepancies for CAT II airports.

 

Action/Outcome:

a.  Action – Jackson Seltzer will provide a status report to the group re: MALSR. Dick Temple agreed to take the RVR issue off-line with Steve Kuhar

Action —Connie Streeter, AFS-260 Lead—Revise OpSpec C059:

"The certificate holder is authorized to conduct Category II (CAT II) instrument approach and landing operations to the airports and runways listed in Table 3 of this operations specification using the procedures and minimums specified in this paragraph and shall conduct no other CAT II operations under this authorization."

....................

b.  The certificate holder is authorized to use the airplanes listed in Table 1 below using the following CAT II straight-in approach and landing minimums at 14 CFR Part 97 CAT II runways and the authorized foreign airports and runways listed in Table 3 of this operations specification, provided all the applicable limitations and provisions of this operations specification are met.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.  OpSpec C359, Special Authorization For Certain Category II Operations at Specifically Approved Facilities

 

Background:   Order 8400.13 was published November 2002.  When OpSpec C059 for CAT II operations was revised, OpSpec C359 was put into place because of the requirements of Order 8400.13 for CAT II operations.  Even though this OpSpec is in the “300” series, for authorization the operator does not have to follow the “nonstandard OpSpec process” for its authorization.s published November 2002.  When OpSpec C059 for CAT II operations was revised, OpSpec C359 was put into place because of the requirements of Order 8400.13 for CAT II operations.  Even though this OpSpec is in the “300” series, for authorization the operator does not have to follow the “nonstandard OpSpec process” for its authorization.r CAT II operations.  Even though this OpSpec is in the “300” series, for authorization the operator does not have to follow the “nonstandard OpSpec process” for its authorization.

 

FAA Lead:  AFS-410/AFS-200

Industry Lead:  Jim Johnson, AA

 

Desired Outcome:  Explanation of how to be able to use C359.

 

Action/Outcome: 

 

 

 

 

9.  OpSpec C070. Airport Listing

Background:  OpSpec C070 is used for listing the airports approved for scheduled passenger-carrying operations.  Since the publication of 14 CFR part 119 there is still confusion about the definitions of airports and which ones should be listed.

 

FAA Lead:  AFS-200/AFS dispatch specialists

Industry Lead:  Jackson Seltzer

Desired Outcome:  

a.  Explanation of airports that must be listed. 

b.  How can we show the CMO which airports we have changed when we ask them to sign the revision?

 

 

Action/Outcome: 

b   AFS-260 is providing a draft of the changes that probably should be made to the OpSpec and to the guidance.

b.  Use the “Document Compare” feature—copies of the instructions will be available.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Day 2

 

10.  OpSpec C050, Special PIC Qualification Airports—14 CFR Section 121.445 Airport List Review & Recommendation of OSWG to AFS-220:

Background :   Advisory Circular 121.445 was cancelled and replaced with OpSpec C050 and guidance that directs the OSWG members to present additions and deletions to the 14 CFR Section 121.445 Special PIC Qualification Airport List.  The recommendation must include the airport information on the completed Airport Assessment Form found in association with OpSpec C050 and on the www.opspecs.com website.  The OSWG members should review the assessment and make a recommendation to FAA Headquarters, specifically AFS-220.  This recommendation will become a part of the OSWG minutes and presented to AFS-220 within 2 weeks of the quarterly OSWG meeting.  The Airport Assessment Form for each specific airport recommendation will also be forwarded to AFS-220.  AFS-220 will make the final determination in regard to the request and recommendation.  If a change in the Special PIC Qualification Airport List is to be made, the OSWG members will be notified by email, the revised List will be posted on www.opspecs.com and in the OPSS guidance subsystem, and reported at the next quarterly OSWG meeting.

 

Industry Lead:  Casey Seabright, NWA

FAA Lead:  Bruce Montiguey, POI for ATA

 

Desired Outcome:  A known process for updating the Special PIC Qualification Airport List.

Action/Outcome:  A consistent process for updating the Special PIC Qualification Airport List.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11.  OpSpec A012, Domestic Operations to Foreign Points.  Part 121 only

Background: A012 appears to give certificate holders authority to comply with U.S. domestic alternate requirements when foreign, in one case Canada, regulations are more restrictive.  14 CFR Section 121.11 requires each certificate holder to comply with the most restrictive regulation.

 

Industry Lead = ?

FAA Lead = Bruce Montiguey, POI for ATA

 

Desired Outcome: Clarify that this does not give an exemption to 14 CFR Section 91.703 nor to Section 121.11.

 

Action/Outcome: Bruce suggests the following minor revision to A012 would appropriately address the issue:

 

(6) 1st choice:  Regulations applicable to domestic operations must be complied with for the operations between the airports authorized by this operation specification, except as required for compliance with 14 CFR section 91.703(a)(2).

2nd choice: Regulations applicable to domestic operations must be complied with for the operations between the airports authorized by this operation specification, except as required for compliance with 14 CFR Section 121.11.

 

12.  OpSpec A013, Operations Without Certain Emergency Equipment (deviation)

Background:

a.  An FAA CMO determined that there was a need for a ditching demonstration (14 CFR Section 121.291) for its cert holder, even though it would be greatly abbreviated due to no life raft installed to demo.  Current guidance does not make this connection and apparently some carriers that have this deviation have not done a ditching demo.  That CMO requests that the ditching demo be added to the requirement for this deviation.

Perhaps the IOPPS A013 paragraph drop down menu guidance could include a note something to the effect that "ISSUANCE OF THIS PARAGRAPH AND PARAGRAPH A005 DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE NEED FOR AT LEAST AN ABBREVIATED DITCHING DEMONSTRATION."

b .  A regulatory change to 14 CFR Part 135 now allows for a similar deviation for Part 135 certificate holders.

 

FAA Lead =  Alaska CMO/Connie Streeter

Industry Lead = ? (part 121))/ Dave Hewitt, Part 135

 

Desired Outcome:

a.  It was suggested that we do not change the OpSpec but consider updating the guidance to suggest that a demo may need to be done if a ditching demo has never been done with the make/model of airplane IAW Section 121.291 that is proposed for the A013 operation. 

b.  Provide similar OpSpec & guidance for the Part 135 certificate holders.

Action/Outcome: 

a.  AFS-260 has added the following statement to the OpSpec JobAid for A013 and will revise the Order 8400.10 guidance for A013 accordingly:

l. Issuance of OpSpec paragraphs A013 andA005 may not preclude the need for at least an abbreviated ditching demonstration.   Depending upon the circumstances, the CMO may require an abbreviated ditching demonstration before submitting the request to HQ.

b.  Dave Hewitt, Industry Lead:  Design an OpSpec A013 specifically for the Part 135 database to provide the same deviation for 14 CFR Part 135 certificate holders .

13.  OpSpec C058.  Foreign Instrument Procedures.

Background:   The FAA is revising Order 8260.31 which is the guidance for OpSpec C058.  The OSWG representatives provided comments last October.

 

Industry Lead = Casey Seabright, NWA

FAA Lead = AFS-400/AFS-200

 

Desired Outcome:  Agreement between the FAA and the affected operators on the requirements.

 

Action/Outcome:  Casey Seabright will update the group on the progress. (Attachments).  The TOARC continues to work on the revision to Order 8260.31 and intends to resolve the major conflicts before final publication.  At some point in the future the TOARC committee plans to provide a revision on the TOARC website for review & comments.

 

 

 

14.  OpSpec C066 , Turbojet Airplane Takeoff Operations in Tailwind Conditions Not to Exceed 15 Knots

Background:   Chuck Schramek presented (at previous OSWG meeting) the reasons for additional restrictions for 15 kt tailwind takeoff authorization.  AFM performance penalties are already restrictive.

 

Industry Lead = Chuck Schramek, Delta AirLines

FAA Lead = AFS-400/AFS-200

 

Desired Outcome:  Chuck will provide a copy of his proposal to anyone that contacts him; Connie agreed to pose the question to the FAA’s expert, Don Simpson; FAA There should also be a review the OpSpec paragraphs themselves to see if they are presented for authorization correctly.

 

 

 

Action/Outcome: 

 

 

 

 

 

15.  OpSpecs C059/C060—CAT II/CAT III Lists on AFS-410 Website

Background:  Frustration in regard to the CAT II/III list not being updated in a timely manner—and the requirement for the CAT III domestic airports to be listed in OpSpec C060 before an air carrier can conduct CAT III operations at that runway

 

Industry Lead = Casey Seabright, NWA

FAA Lead = AFS-400/AFS-200

 

Desired Outcome:   Hooper Harris, AFS-400 has requested that the OSWG work with him to overhaul the CAT II/III procedure authorization process.

 

Action/Outcome:  Casey Seabright to provide background for discussion

 

 

 

 

16.  C078.  Lower Than Standard Take-Off Minimums. (Re-rolled because of typo in the 600 RVR selection)

Background: 

At the last quarterly OSWG Chuck Schramek discussed the issue for takeoff and departure operations at Las Vegas. 

Question also about SLC:   Runway 17/35 at KSLC is not included in their SMGCS Plan so no operations below 1200 RVR are authorized on that runway.  I therefore asked Jepp to change the takeoff minimums at SLC rwy 17/35 to 1200 RVR since the runway infrastructure supports takeoffs down to at least 1200 RVR.  OpSpecs and SMGCS do not agree.  OpSpecs addresses 1600, 1000, 500 and below 500.  NO SMGCS limits to 1200 or above.  SMGCS cutoffs are below 1200 to 600, then below 600 to 300.  Allowable take off minimums are the maximum of any limits, OpSpecs, SMGCS, etc.

SLC rwy 17/35 is soon to be included in their SMGCS plan down to 600 RVR.  Once that happens I will ask Jepp to change the SLC rwy 17/35 takeoff minimums to 600 RVR. Norm Lefevre, (425) 227-1737.

 

The following group agreed to get together to resolve the effect of the SMGCS issue:

 

Tom Schneider, AFS-420

Chuck Schramek, DALA

Kelly Dixon, Skywest

Jeppesen Representative

FAA CSET-Bob Januzzi

Jerry Ostronic, AFS-220

Dick Temple, AFS-410

Jack Wilkes, ALPA

Connie Streeter, AFS-260

 

Industry Lead = Chuck Schramek, Delta AirLines

FAA Lead = AFS-400/AFS-200

 

Desired Outcome:   

a.  Resolution of the 4 RVR requirements

b.  How is official notification made to the public that a runway has 4 RVR?

 

Action/Outcome: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17.  Other Miscellaneous Items:

a.  SMGCS plans on web

Desired Outcome Carriers would like to query the FAA (appropriate departments) to find out if it is possible to have FAA-approved SMGCS plans available to the carriers electronically.

Discussion: 

Action: 

 

 

 

b.  Viewing Other OpSpecs.

Background:   Only FAA personnel have ever been able to view all certificate holder’s operations specifications.  Because these documents are non-proprietary, there is no legal reason that this viewing must be restricted.  Until now, the air carriers have chosen to not have this feature available to them.  However, because we now have IOPSS and the certificate holders can process their own OpSpec paragraphs, the question comes up from time-to-time as to whether or not it is time to make it possible for the air carriers to be able to see other air carrer’s OpSpecs. 

Discussion: Casey Seabright would like to reopen the discussion regarding the ability to view other U.S carriers OpSpecs via the IOPSS system.

Action:  

 

 

 

 

c.  Part 145, Repair Stations.  

Background:   Part 145 regulation revision is scheduled to be published by the end of January 2004.

Action:  Information--Part 145 OpSpecs [several but not all] will be revised when the new Part 145 rule is published—estimated to occur by the end of January 2004.  The paragraphs that change will need to be re-issued.

 

18.  Additional Information in regard to Operations Specifications paragraphs:

a.  Changes in Part 135

Background .  Changes in Part 135 resulted in the necessity of two new Part 135 OpSpec paragraphs. 

Desired Outcome :  To provide a standard vehicle for the eligible on-demand authorization and to provide t he eligible on-demand certificate holder a vehicle for authorization to use the Destination Airport Analysis Program.

Action :  OpSpec A057, Eligible On-Demand and OpSpec C049, Destination Airport Analysis Program, were developed and published in the OPSS.  Guidance for Order 8400.10 is pending.

 

b.  OpSpec A301, Acquisition and Mergers,

Background.  As the OPSS develops, it is necessary to revise old policy to accommodate changes that are being made.  The “500 series” of OpSpec paragraphs is now the area where we put “time-limited” authorizations and documents.  Revised guidance for acquisitions and mergers is in coordination. 

Desired Outcome.  Thus, it became apparent that OpSpec A301 was not longer considered to be “nonstandard” and that it is a “time-limited” authorization and should be moved to A502.

Action:  OpSpec A301 will be moved to OpSpec A502, Acquisitions and Mergers, because it is a time-limited paragraph.  However, in processing this paragraph the POI of the gaining certificate needs to coordinate the acquisition/merger process with the appropriate Flight Standards regional office, as necessary. 

 

c.  Part 125, New OpSpec A051

Background .  Ongoing investigations of part 125 certificate holders is resulting in the FAA revising its guidance and requirements for the operations that part 125 certificate holders can conduct.

Desired Outcome :  Part 125 certificate holders conducting operations in compliance with Part 125…..and to ensure that they are not conducting operations that must be conducted under part 121.

Action:  Adding a new paragraph A051, Currently Held Contracts, in an attempt to ensure that a part 125 operator has appropriate contracts for the kind of operations they are conducting.

 

d.  Part 121, new OpSpec A048.  Verification of Personnel for Access to Flightdeck

Background :  Originally the FAA published guidance that the electronic databases to be used for the verification of personnel for access to the flightdeck should be authorized in OpSpec A025. 

Desired Outcome :  As AFS-200 is in the process of incorporating that guidance into the Order 8400.10, it was decided that it would be better for this authorization to have its own OpSpec paragraph. 

Action:  The new OpSpec A048 will read something like:

a.  The certificate holder is authorized to allow appropriate persons access to the flightdeck using an approved method of verification of employment status and eligibility.

 

b.  The following is a description of the approved method or the manual reference that describes the approved method:

 

TEXT01

TEXT99

 

A004 statement:  The certificate holder is authorized to allow access to the flightdeck using an approved method of verification.

 

 

e.  Henceforth , if you request items for the quarterly OSWG agenda, the item will need to be submitted to Connie Streeter & Casey Seabright with the following information:

   Background:  

Industry Lead =

FAA Lead =

Desired Outcome: 

Paragraphs revised in the last quarter include:

 

                       Control    Always Auth./

Para    CFR       Rev   Date        Optional       Type of Change

----   -------   ---  --------   -------------    --------------

 B042   121       01b   10/28/03  Optional         Non-Mandatory

 B042   121/135   01b   10/28/03  Optional         Non-Mandatory

 

 C059   121       040   11/04/03  Optional         Mandatory

 C059   121/135   040   11/04/03  Optional         Mandatory

 C059   125       020   11/04/03  Optional         Mandatory

 C059   135       040   11/04/03  Optional         Mandatory

 

 C359   121       000   11/04/03  Optional         New Release

 C359   121/135   000   11/04/03  Optional         New Release

 C359   125       000   11/04/03  Optional         New Release

 C359   135       000   11/04/03  Optional         New Release

 

 MA001  91K       000   11/04/03  Always Auth.     New Release

 MA002  91K       000   11/04/03  Always Auth.     New Release

 MA003  91K       000   11/04/03  Always Auth.     New Release

 MA007  91K       000   11/04/03  Always Auth.     New Release

 MA008  91K       000   11/04/03  Always Auth.     New Release

 MA009  91K       000   11/04/03  Always Auth.     New Release

 MA010  91K       000   11/04/03  Always Auth.     New Release

 MA014  91K       000   11/04/03  Optional         New Release

 MA025  91K       000   11/04/03  Optional         New Release

 MA031  91K       000   11/04/03  Optional         New Release

 MA032  91K       000   11/04/03  Optional         New Release

 MA033  91K       000   11/04/03  Optional         New Release

 MA034  91K       000   11/04/03  Optional         New Release

 MA044  91K       000   11/04/03  Optional         New Release

 MA052  91K       000   11/04/03  Optional         New Release

 MA056  91K       000   11/04/03  Optional         New Release

 MA058  91K       000   11/04/03  Optional         New Release

 MA059  91K       000   11/04/03  Optional         New Release

 MA447  91K       000   11/04/03  Always Auth.     New Release

 MA449  91K       000   11/04/03  Always Auth.     New Release

 MB030  91K       000   11/06/03  Optional         New Release

 MB031  91K       000   11/06/03  Always Auth.     New Release

 MB032  91K       000   11/06/03  Optional         New Release

 MB034  91K       000   11/06/03  Optional         New Release

 MB035  91K       000   11/06/03  Optional         New Release

 MB036  91K       000   11/06/03  Optional         New Release

 MB037  91K       000   11/06/03  Optional         New Release

 MB038  91K       000   11/06/03  Optional         New Release

 MB039  91K       000   11/06/03  Optional         New Release

 MB040  91K       000   11/06/03  Optional         New Release

 MB046  91K       000   11/06/03  Optional         New Release

 MB050  91K       000   11/06/03  Optional         New Release

 MB055  91K       000   11/06/03  Optional         New Release

 MB059  91K       000   11/06/03  Optional         New Release

 

 D485   121       000   11/12/03  Always Auth.     New Release

 D485   121/135   000   11/12/03  Always Auth.     New Release

 D485   129       000   11/12/03  Always Auth.     New Release

 D485   135       000   11/12/03  Always Auth.     New Release

 

 MD072  91K       000   11/18/03  Optional         New Release

 MD073  91K       000   11/18/03  Always Auth.     New Release

 MD076  91K       000   11/18/03  Optional         New Release

 MD084  91K       000   11/18/03  Optional         New Release

 MD085  91K       000   11/18/03  Always Auth.     New Release

 MD089  91K       000   11/18/03  Always Auth.     New Release

 MD092  91K       000   11/18/03  Optional         New Release

 MD095  91K       000   11/18/03  Optional         New Release

 MD101  91K       000   11/18/03  Optional         New Release

 MD102  91K       000   11/18/03  Optional         New Release

 MD104  91K       000   11/18/03  Optional         New Release

 MH101  91K       000   11/19/03  Optional         New Release

 MH102  91K       000   11/19/03  Optional         New Release

 MH103  91K       000   11/19/03  Optional         New Release

 MH104  91K       000   11/19/03  Optional         New Release

 MH105  91K       000   11/19/03  Optional         New Release

 MH107  91K       000   11/19/03  Optional         New Release

 MH108  91K       000   11/19/03  Optional         New Release

 MH109  91K       000   11/19/03  Optional         New Release

 MH110  91K       000   11/19/03  Optional         New Release

 MH111  91K       000   11/19/03  Optional         New Release

 MH112  91K       000   11/19/03  Optional         New Release

 MH113  91K       000   11/19/03  Optional         New Release

 MH114  91K       000   11/19/03  Optional         New Release

 MH117  91K       000   11/19/03  Optional         New Release

 MH118  91K       000   11/19/03  Optional         New Release

 MH119  91K       000   11/19/03  Optional         New Release

 MH121  91K       000   11/19/03  Optional         New Release

 MH122  91K       000   11/19/03  Optional         New Release

 MC051  91K       000   11/21/03  Optional         New Release

 MC052  91K       000   11/21/03  Optional         New Release

 MC059  91K       000   11/21/03  Optional         New Release

 MC060  91K       000   11/21/03  Optional         New Release

 MC061  91K       000   11/21/03  Optional         New Release

 MC076  91K       000   11/21/03  Optional         New Release

 MC081  91K       000   11/21/03  Optional         New Release

 MC359  91K       000   11/21/03  Optional         New Release

 D095   91        010   11/24/03  Optional         Mandatory

 MC049  91K       000   12/02/03  Optional         New Release

 MD084  91K       010   12/09/03  Optional         Mandatory

 

 C049   121/135   000   12/02/03  Optional         New Release

 C049   135       000   12/02/03  Optional         New Release

 A002   142       020   12/02/03  Always Auth.     Mandatory

 C067   121       020   12/09/03  Optional         Mandatory

 D084   121       030   12/09/03  Optional         Mandatory

 D084   121/135   040   12/09/03  Optional         Mandatory

 D084   135       030   12/09/03  Optional         Mandatory

 B029   121       000   12/10/03  Optional         New Release

 B029   121/135   000   12/10/03  Optional         New Release

 B029   135       000   12/10/03  Optional         New Release

 D485   129.14    000   12/16/03  Always Auth.     New Release

 A057   121/135   000   12/17/03  Optional         New Release

 A057   135       000   12/17/03  Optional         New Release

 C064   121       03a   12/17/03  Optional         Non-Mandatory

 C064   121/135   03a   12/17/03  Optional         Non-Mandatory

 C064   135       03a   12/17/03  Optional         Non-Mandatory

 

Summary of Changes:

B042 - OSWG requested revision of subparagraph a(4) to specifically include departure, destination, regular, re-fueling and provisional airports specified in C070 as ER-OPS alternate airports without listing in a.(4).

 C059 - Revision to All Weather Ops guidance, OpSpec C059, and original roll of C359.

 

 C359 - New Release

 91K - Initial release of Management Specification paragraphs for 91K Fractional Ownership.

 D485 - New Release

 D095(FAR 91) - Revised for inclusion into OPSS and subparagraphs b and c per AFS-260 and AFS-800.

 C049 - New Release

 A002(FAR 142) - Removed definitions that are defined in the regulation.

 C067(121) - Removed reference to 121.445 and updated OpSpec language per Section 121.590.

 MD084 - Revised to incorporate the new ferry permit language involving A.D's.

 D084  - Revised to incorporate the new ferry permit language involving A.D's.

 B029 - New Release

 A057 - New Release

 C064 - Revised to accommodate deviation in A057.