VOLUME 4 AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT AND OPERATIONAL AUTHORIZATIONS
CHAPTER 15 ELECTRONIC FLIGHT BAG PROGRAM EVALUATION AND AUTHORIZATION
Section 1 Evaluation and Authorization
4-1641 REPORTING SYSTEM(S). The following tracking codes are used to document
inspector activities during the evaluation of an Electronic Flight Bag (EFB) program.
A. Program Tracking and Reporting Subsystem (PTRS). Use the following
PTRS activity codes to record EFB-related oversight activities: 1443, 3443, and 5443.
B. Safety Assurance System (SAS). For Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
parts 121 and
the principal inspector (PI) or aviation safety inspector (ASI) will utilize this guidance related to SAS Elements 1.2.2 (OP) Manual Management,
2.1.1 (OP) Training of Flight Crewmembers, 2.2.1 (OP) Airman Duties/Flight Deck Procedures, and 5.2.1 (OP) Crewmember Duties/Cabin Procedures.
4-1642 PURPOSE. This section provides references, information, and guidance
to be used to evaluate an operator’s initial application for operations specification (OpSpec)/management
specification (MSpec)/Letter of Authorization (LOA) A061 or to evaluate a significant modification to an existing EFB program.
4-1643 APPLICABILITY. This guidance applies to 14 CFR parts
91 subpart K (part
in coordination with the appropriate cabin safety inspector (CSI) and dispatch safety inspector (DSI).
A. EFB Program. An EFB is any device, or combination of devices, running
EFB software applications. Operators seeking EFB program authorization will utilize the language within Advisory Circular (AC)
for Use of Electronic Flight Bags, to develop an EFB program. The program specifics (i.e., operating procedures, pertinent
training modules, checklists, operations manuals, training manuals, maintenance
programs, minimum equipment lists (MEL), other pertinent documents, and reporting
procedures) are developed and incorporated into operator policy before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
grants authorization. FAA authorization for an EFB program is granted through the issuance of OpSpec/MSpec/LOA A061.
B. EFB Program Authorization. The initial authorization for an EFB program
establishes a baseline for an operator’s authorized use of EFB hardware and
software. The authorization recognizes the operator’s ability to manage their
EFB program with an appropriate level of FAA involvement. PIs are given authority
to tailor the formality and process of an assessment appropriate to the scope of the modifications proposed by the operator.
4-1645 RESOURCES. The following are resources to be referenced in the evaluation process.
Flight Standards (FS) AC addresses considerations for EFB hardware, EFB software applications, and all the required and applicable
elements that should be incorporated into an EFB program. AC
a means of addressing many elements that an operator may incorporate into an EFB program. Some elements are necessary to every program
(e.g., EFB program catalog), and others are optional elements (e.g., electronic
charts). An operator may elect to provide an alternate means; however, such
action may require further FAA evaluation at the discretion of the Principal Operations Inspector (POI).
B. Aircraft Evaluation Division. The Aircraft Evaluation Division evaluates
installed EFB equipment and approved EFB software applications for operational
suitability and may recommend additional training, checking, and currency considerations. Evaluation of
portable EFB hardware or nonapproved commercial off‑the-shelf (COTS) EFB software applications will be at the discretion of the division.
C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB) Reports and Operational Suitability
Reports (OSR). FSB Reports and OSRs may contain information that can help
an inspector evaluate an EFB program application. FSB Reports or OSRs containing
recommendations pertaining to EFBs for a particular model aircraft are controlling.
FSB Reports and OSRs are published on the FAA’s Flight Standards Information Management System (FSIMS)
(http://fsims.faa.gov) “Publications” tab
under the “MMEL & AEG Guidance Documents,” “Flight Standardization Board (FSB) Reports” section.
D. Letter of Operational Suitability (OSL). An OSL may be issued by the
Aircraft Evaluation Division to a hardware manufacturer or Type B software developer.
These letters do not grant operational authorization, but indicate some previous
FAA evaluation of performance. OSLs are not published on FSIMS because they are not complete operational evaluations.
Normally, these letters are distributed by the manufacturer, but can also be obtained directly from the division.
E. FS Assistance. The following FS divisions can be contacted regarding EFB policy:
• Air Transportation Division at 202-267-8166.
• Aircraft Maintenance Division at 202-267-1675.
• Flight Technologies and Procedures Division at
• General Aviation and Commercial Division at
F. OpSpec Guidance.
Volume 3, Chapter 18, Section 3 provides
administrative guidance for the issuance of A061.
4-1646 INITIAL EFB PROGRAM EVALUATION. An operator seeking to use EFBs in
its flight operations must develop an EFB program and submit an application
for OpSpec/MSpec/LOA A061. PIs must use the five‑phase process described in
Volume 3, Chapter 1, Section 1 as
a guideline for the evaluation and authorization of initial EFB program applications. PIs may also utilize the checklists within
Volume 4, Chapter 15, Section 2 to
validate an operator’s initial EFB program
application. The following is additional guidance for initial EFB program evaluation.
A. Review Published Guidance. FAA personnel responsible for evaluating any part of an A061 application must read AC
Volume 3, Chapter 18, Section 3 (A061);
and this guidance
(Volume 4, Chapter 15, Sections 1 and
2) in their entirety to ensure an understanding
of the FAA’s EFB policy. The AC and the Order 8900.1 sections are complementary
documents. Inspectors must use the AC as the primary reference to assess an
EFB program application. Inspectors responsible for accepting and evaluating an application can use the checklist in
Volume 4, Chapter 15, Section 2 as
an additional aid to help identify specific requirements defined in the AC.
NOTE: PIs must contact the Flight Technologies and Procedures Division for assistance
with the evaluation of any proposed EFB function not listed in appendix A or B of AC
Flight Technologies and Procedures Division may also be contacted
to assist in evaluations of applications outlining a means other than what is described in the AC.
B. EFB Program Catalog. The EFB program catalog is one of the most important
aspects of an EFB program and PIs should make sure the catalog and the processes
associated with it are well-defined and demonstrated. The catalog is a reference
of the EFB hardware (make and model (M/M)) and EFB software applications used
by crewmembers on each aircraft make, model, and series (M/M/S). An EFB program
must have a process defined to keep the catalog current. In addition, a record
of all EFB program catalog revisions must be maintained by the operator. PIs
must have access to the current catalog, when requested, to facilitate the performance of surveillance and oversight functions.
C. EFB Program Modifications. POIs must verify that an operator’s proposed
EFB program has the processes in place to identify, incorporate, and evaluate minor EFB program changes, as defined by AC
must have a reasonable expectation with the process because EFB program authorization is intended to allow operators to manage their EFB
program with a limited level of FAA involvement. Operators must demonstrate
their ability to autonomously manage minor changes while identifying appropriate times for FAA involvement
(i.e., significant changes). Operators must update the program catalog with all minor and significant program changes.
1) The POI must observe and verify the operator’s ability to manage
an EFB program and conduct flight operations in a planned demonstration period.
The demonstration phase for an initial EFB program must:
• Include at least 6 months of flight operations.
• Allow observation and data collection of the EFB
use in actual flight operations.
• Allow observation of EFB program management
processes, to include the ability to evaluate program modifications, revise software applications, and manage the EFB program catalog.
• Begin with the issuance of A061 with a temporary
authorization condition (see details in subparagraph E below).
2) The demonstration concludes when the POI determines the operator
has provided sufficient proof to satisfy the FAA’s requirement for meeting all
the plan objectives, or when the operator is unable to complete them satisfactorily.
E. Temporary Authorization. Issuance of OpSpec/MSpec/LOA A061 with a temporary
authorization condition is required when the POI requires demonstration in actual
flight operations. When operations are being conducted with a temporary authorization,
the operator must have an additional independent means of acquiring required
information in-flight (i.e., a backup) in the event of a failure or common mode
error of the evaluated items. The backup strategy and the EFB are not used simultaneously
during the demonstration period, but the backup strategy must be available.
Once OpSpec/MSpec/LOA A061 is issued without temporary authorization, the backup may be removed.
4-1647 EVALUATING MODIFICATIONS TO EFB PROGRAMS. Once an operator receives
authorization for an EFB program, they may elect to modify the hardware, software
applications, procedures, or aircraft associated with the program. PIs may also utilize the checklists within
Volume 4, Chapter 15, Section 2 to
validate, as applicable, an operator’s EFB program modification.
A. Minor Modifications. Operators issued A061 are allowed to incorporate
and evaluate minor changes into their EFB programs. An authorized EFB program
must have a process for the operator to determine if a modification is minor.
All minor modifications incorporated by an operator must be recorded in the
EFB program catalog, and operators must keep a record of all revisions to the catalog.
B. Significant Modifications. The POI must conduct a formal assessment
of any modification to an EFB program that is not considered minor. POIs are encouraged to use
Volume 4, Chapter 15, Section 2 as
a general outline for the evaluation and authorization of new modifications. Because an operator can seek
to modify their authorized EFB program in a variety of ways, it is impracticable
to define a standard assessment to fit all possible requests. The POIs must
work with the operator to define/develop an assessment with the formality, timeline,
and demonstration parameters appropriate to the modification requested. Past operator experience and performance should also be considered.
4-1648 LIMITED EVALUATIONS. An operator may desire to conduct a limited
evaluation of a program modification in actual flight operations for business/safety
case purposes. POIs can authorize these evaluations by issuing a remark in A061.
In general, this should only be a consideration if all other means (e.g., simulator
testing) of evaluating an EFB program modification are considered inadequate.
These types of evaluations should be small in scope (i.e., approximately 15
percent or less of total pilots and/or flight attendants (F/A)), performed by
experienced crewmembers, and have defined test parameters. The FAA and the operator
must reach a common understanding of what will be necessary to achieve the goals
of the evaluation and define the limitations and conditions (if necessary).
RESERVED. Paragraphs 4-1649 through 4-1652.