Unscoped DCT Report (Standard DCT)


MLF Label: 4.6.2 (AW) Continued Airworthiness and Safety Programs DCT Type: ED DCT Specialty: Airworthiness Peer Group: A - Part 121 Air Operators DCT Revision: 24.0 on 12/28/21 (Released)
Summary Information

Purpose (Certificate Holder Responsibility): To provide Continued Airworthiness and Safety Programs standards for aging airplane inspections such as; records reviews, repairs assessments for pressurized fuselages, supplemental inspections, fuel tank system maintenance programs, limit of validity, flammability reduction means, and fuel tank vent explosion protection.
Objective (FAA Responsibility): Determine if the CH will be able to; (1) Comply with regulations; (2) Provide Continued Airworthiness and Safety Programs standards for aging airplane inspections such as; records reviews, repairs assessments for pressurized fuselages, supplemental inspections, fuel tank system maintenance programs, limit of validity, flammability reduction means, and fuel tank vent explosion protection.

 (AW) Continued Airworthiness and Safety Programs Element includes the following System(s) and Subsystem(s)

Questions Answers Comments
  4.6.2 (AW) Continued Airworthiness and Safety Programs
1   
Does the CAMP include requirements to ensure airplanes are not operated unless the certificate holder has been notified by the Administrator or designee that the required aging airplane inspection and records review have been completed?


REFERENCES: D072, 121.1105(b)

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "AGING AIRPLANE INSPECTIONS AND RECORDS") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:22:09 AM, 

QID:
 00006945, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
2   
Do the procedures specify that the certificate holder will notify the Administrator at least 60 days before the date on which the airplane and airplane records will be made available for the aging inspection and records review?


REFERENCES: 121.1105(e)

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "AGING AIRPLANE INSPECTIONS AND RECORDS") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:22:09 AM, 

QID:
 00006946, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
3   
Do the procedures specify that the certificate holder will make available to the Administrator each airplane with records containing the following information:

      #1 Total years in service of the airplane;
      #2 Total time in service of the airframe;
      #3 Total flight cycles of the airframe; and
      #4 Date of the last inspection and records review?

REFERENCES: 121.1105(d)

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "AGING AIRPLANE INSPECTIONS AND RECORDS") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:22:09 AM, 

QID:
 00006947, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
4   
Do the procedures specify that the certificate holder will make available to the Administrator each airplane with records containing the following information:

      #1 Current status of airframe life-limited parts;
      #2 Time since the last overhaul of all structural components requiring an overhaul on a specific time basis;
      #3 Current inspection status of the airplane including the time since the last inspection required by the inspection program under which the airplane is maintained;
      #4 Current status of applicable ADs including the date and methods of compliance and, if the AD involves a recurring action, the time and date when the next action is required;
      #5 A list of major structural alterations; and
      #6 A report of major structural repairs and the current inspection status for those repairs?

REFERENCES: 121.1105(d)

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "AGING AIRPLANE INSPECTIONS AND RECORDS") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:22:09 AM, 

QID:
 00006952, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
5   
Do the procedures specify the method to request Administrator approval in the event of an unforeseen scheduling conflict?


REFERENCES: 121.1105(c)

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "AGING AIRPLANE INSPECTIONS AND RECORDS") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:22:09 AM, 

QID:
 00006959, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
6   
Does the CAMP include FAA-approved repair assessment guidelines for the fuselage pressure boundary?


REFERENCES: D097, 121.1107(a)

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:19 AM, 

QID:
 00006961, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
7   
Do the procedures specify data collection requirements that include:

      #1 The structures which require repair assessments;
      #2 A survey of the structure to locate repairs;
      #3 A record (survey form) used to record key repair design features needed to accomplish a repair assessment; and
      #4 A collection of repair details for analysis or immediate corrective action if static strength requirements have not been met or are in poor condition?

REFERENCES: AC-120-73

NOTE: This is provided by the TC holder or using an FAA-approved method.

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:43 AM, 

QID:
 00006962, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
8   
Do the procedures specify repair classifications will be into one of the following three categories:

      #1 Category A: Permanent repair for which the baseline zonal inspection is adequate to ensure continued airworthiness (inspectability) equal to the unrepaired surrounding structure;
      #2 Category B: Permanent repair that requires supplemental inspections to ensure continued airworthiness; or
      #3 Category C: Temporary (time-limited) repair that will need to be reworked or replaced prior to an established time limit?

REFERENCES: AC-120-73

NOTE: This is provided by the TC holder or using an FAA-approved method.

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:43 AM, 

QID:
 00006967, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
9   
Do the procedures specify the supplemental inspection/replacement requirements for Category B and C repairs are determined by using:

      #1 Calculation;
      #2 Predetermined values provided by the TC holder; or
      #3 Other values obtained using an FAA-approved method?

REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:43 AM, 

QID:
 00006971, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
10   
Do the procedures specify that the certificate holder may choose to accomplish:

      #1 All three stages at once; or
      #2 Stage 1 only?

REFERENCES: AC-120-73

NOTE: In the latter case, the Operator would be required to adhere to the schedule specified in the FAA-approved model-specific repair assessment guidelines for completion of stages 2 and 3.

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:44 AM, 

QID:
 00006976, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
11   
Do the procedures require the certificate holder to choose an inspection method and interval per FAA-approved repair assessment guidelines?


REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:44 AM, 

QID:
 00006979, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
12   
Do the procedures include requirements for determining if repair inspection requirements are fulfilled by the chosen method and interval?


REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:55 AM, 

QID:
 00006980, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
13   
Do the procedures specify repairs that fulfill inspection requirements be inspected per the FAA-approved maintenance or inspection program?


REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:44 AM, 

QID:
 00006981, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
14   
Do the procedures specify that for any repair that is not permanent or does not fulfill the inspection requirements that:

      #1 The repair must be upgraded to allow utilization of the chosen inspection method and interval; or
      #2 The repair must be individually tracked to account for the repair's unique inspection method and interval requirements?

REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:55 AM, 

QID:
 00006982, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
15   
Do the procedures specify the repair assessment process be repeated at each inspection interval?


REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:44 AM, 

QID:
 00006985, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
16   
Do the procedures specify that repairs added between predetermined maintenance visits, including interim repairs installed at remote locations, will:

      #1 Have a threshold greater than the length of the predetermined maintenance visit; or
      #2 Be tracked individually to account for the repairs unique inspection method and interval requirements?

REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:55 AM, 

QID:
 00006986, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
17   
Do the procedures specify that repairs that cannot easily be upgraded to Category A for cost, downtime, or technical reasons will:

      #1 Receive supplemental inspections; and
      #2 Have maintenance or inspection program provisions for incorporating these supplemental inspections?

REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:44 AM, 

QID:
 00006989, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
18   
Do the procedures specify the means by which the repair assessment guidelines are incorporated into an certificate holders FAA-approved maintenance or inspection program are subject to approval from the certificate holders Principal Maintenance Inspector or other cognizant airworthiness inspector?


REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:44 AM, 

QID:
 00006992, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
19   
Do the procedures specify that for any proposed maintenance or inspection program revisions of any FAA-approved repair assessment guidelines, the proposal must be submitted to the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office for the affected airplane.


REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  4  6/25/2019 10:58:31 AM, 

QID:
 00006993, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
20   
Do the procedures ensure that for existing repairs:

      #1 The repair assessment process is completed per the schedule in the FAA-approved model-specific repair assessment guidelines for each of the affected airplanes;
      #2 Any necessary actions (revised inspection programs, etc.) taken as a result of the assessment are incorporated into the FAA-approved maintenance or inspection program; and
      #3 An AMOC is obtained if structural repairs mandated by AD are modified?

REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:19 AM, 

QID:
 00006994, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
21   
Do the procedures specify a means to assess new repairs using FAA-approved repair assessment guidelines unless new repairs are accomplished according to:

      #1 The structural repair manuals; or
      #2 Another equivalent method that incorporates damage tolerance methods of design and evaluation?

REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:19 AM, 

QID:
 00006998, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
22   
Do the procedures specify that new repairs require a two-stage repair approval in which:

      #1 A basic structural evaluation to show the repair will meet immediate and short-term strength requirements;
      #2 A more extensive investigation to show repair will meet the long-term strength requirements; and
      #3 That final repair approval is not made until a complete damage tolerance evaluation has been made to show the repair is adequate to ensure continued airworthiness?

REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:20 AM, 

QID:
 00007001, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
23   
Do the procedures specify requirements for the reporting of significant findings to TC holders to ensure that prompt fleet action be taken?


REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:20 AM, 

QID:
 00007005, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
24   
Do the procedures specify repair assessment guidelines record keeping requirements?


REFERENCES: AC-120-73, 121.369(c)

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:20 AM, 

QID:
 00007006, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
25   
Do the procedures specify that operation of an airplane beyond the applicable flight cycle is prohibited unless OpSpecs have been issued that reference repair assessment guidelines and that those guidelines are incorporated in its maintenance program?


REFERENCES: AC-120-73, 121.1107(a)

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:20 AM, 

QID:
 00007007, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
26   
Do the procedures specify that once guidelines have been incorporated into the maintenance or inspection program, the Operator must begin the repair assessment process within the following deadlines:

      #1 Airplane cycle age equal to or less than the implementation time on May 25, 2000;
      #2 Airplane cycle age greater than the implementation time but less than the design service goal on May 25, 2000; or
      #3 Airplane cycle age greater than the design service goal on May 25, 2000?

REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:20 AM, 

QID:
 00007008, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
27   
Do the procedures specify that the certificate holder must evaluate the impact of the change on the repair assessment program when a maintenance or inspection program interval is revised?


REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:44 AM, 

QID:
 00007012, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
28   
Do the procedures specify that when the revised intervals are greater than those in the baseline zonal inspection and the previous classification of Category A repairs are invalid, the certificate holder must:

      #1 Obtain approval for an alternative inspection method;
      #2 Upgrade the repair to allow utilization of the chosen inspection method and interval; or
      #3 Re-categorize repairs as necessary and establish unique supplemental inspection methods and intervals for specific repairs?

REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:45 AM, 

QID:
 00007013, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
29   
Do the procedures specify that when revised intervals are greater than those in the baseline zonal inspection and the previous classification of Category A repairs are invalid, the certificate holder must evaluate the change to determine if the planned maintenance visit continues to fulfill the repair inspection requirements?


REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:45 AM, 

QID:
 00007017, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
30   
Do the procedures specify that before an airplane that was previously operated under an FAA-approved maintenance program is added to the OpSpecs or the certificate holders fleet, a program for accomplishment of the repair assessment should be established and started per the following:

      #1 The previous certificate holders schedule;
      #2 The new certificate holders schedule; or
      #3 The schedule which would result in an earlier accomplishment date for the assessment?

REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:20 AM, 

QID:
 00007018, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
31   
Do the procedures specify that before an airplane that was not previously operated under an FAA-approved maintenance program is added to an OpSpecs or the certificate holders fleet, a program for accomplishment of the repair assessment should be established and the Operator should begin the repair assessment within the required deadline dates?


REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:21 AM, 

QID:
 00007022, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
32   
Do the procedures specify that when the certificate holder acquires a leased foreign-owned airplane they should determine the status of the airplane relative to the model-specific implementation times?


REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (AIRCRAFT OWNERSHIP = "CIVIL AIRCRAFT WHICH IS LEASED OR CHARTERED") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:21 AM, 

QID:
 00007023, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
33   
Do the procedures specify that if the leased foreign-owned airplane:

      #1 Has exceeded or is within one year of exceeding the implementation time, the certificate holder should implement the repair assessment program into the airplane's maintenance or inspection program; or
      #2 Is below the implementation time, the certificate holder should implement the assessment program by the time the airplane has reached the model-specific time requirements?

REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (AIRCRAFT OWNERSHIP = "CIVIL AIRCRAFT WHICH IS LEASED OR CHARTERED") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:21 AM, 

QID:
 00007024, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
34   
Do the procedures specify a means for the certificate holder to develop, submit, and gain FAA approval of guidelines to evaluate repairs to structure(s) which have been modified per a STC?


REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:21 AM, 

QID:
 00007027, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
35   
Do the procedures specify repairs to structure(s), which have been modified per a STC, that can be evaluated using the manufacturers model-specific repair assessment guidelines be documented and submitted to the certificate holders Principal Maintenance Inspector for approval?


REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:21 AM, 

QID:
 00007028, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
36   
Do the procedures specify a separate program for all repairs of structure modified per a STC that cannot be evaluated using the manufacturers model-specific repair assessment guidelines?


REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:21 AM, 

QID:
 00007029, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
37   
Do the procedures specify, for structure(s) approved under STC's, the process to determine:

      #1 An approved design service goal; or
      #2 Approved repair assessment guidelines?

REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:21 AM, 

QID:
 00007030, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
38   
Do the procedures specify that alternate methods of developing repair assessment guidelines must:

      #1 Ascertain the "damage tolerance" of the repairs to the extent necessary to establish what supplemental maintenance actions, if any, are necessary to assure that fatigue damage will be detected before the damage degrades the load-carrying capability of the structure below certification levels; and
      #2 Be submitted jointly to the certificate holders Principal Maintenance Inspector and the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office for the affected airplane?

REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  4  6/25/2019 10:58:31 AM, 

QID:
 00007033, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
39   
Does the CAMP include the following items related to fatigue critical structure:

      #1 Inspections and procedures which are FAA-approved damage-tolerance-based for airplane structures that are susceptible to fatigue cracking and that could contribute to a catastrophic failure;
      #2 A means for addressing the adverse effects, repairs, alterations, and modifications may have on fatigue critical structures;
      #3 A means for addressing the adverse effects, repairs, alterations, and modifications may have on FAA-approved damage-tolerance-based inspections; and
      #4 Requirements specifying that changes to the maintenance program concerning these inspections must be submitted to the Principal Maintenance Inspector for review and approval?

REFERENCES: D097, 121.1109(c)

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:21 AM, 

QID:
 00007048, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
40   
Do the procedures specify how the certificate holder will obtain information necessary to develop an Operator Implementation Plan?


REFERENCES: AC-120-93

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:46 AM, 

QID:
 00007053, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
41   
Do the procedures specify use of the DAH compliance document for basic guidance when:

      #1 Identifying fatigue critical structure;
      #2 Developing tolerance data; and
      #3 Developing implementation schedule information?

REFERENCES: 8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 6 Sec 4

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:46 AM, 

QID:
 00007054, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
42   
Do the procedures specify how the certificate holder will develop an Operator Implementation Plan for airplanes in its fleet using the DAH compliance document?


REFERENCES: 8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 6 Sec 4

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:46 AM, 

QID:
 00007058, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
43   
Does the Operators Implementation Plan include procedures:

      #1 To implement the elements of the repair evaluation guidelines obtained from the TC holders compliance document;
      #2 To determine if damage tolerance inspections exist for those repairs and alterations identified in the airplane survey;
      #3 For a process to obtain damage tolerance inspections for repairs;
      #4 For producing a list of alterations that affect fatigue critical baseline structure on a certificate holders airplane(s);
      #5 To review documents, such as ICAs, relating to alterations developed by persons other than a TC or STC holder to ensure damage tolerance inspections are provided or developed for those alterations;
      #6 For obtaining damage tolerance inspections for new alterations; and
      #7 For obtaining damage tolerance inspections for alterations not supported by a TC or STC holder?

REFERENCES: AC-120-93

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:47 AM, 

QID:
 00007059, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
44   
Does the Operator Implementation Plan include procedures to:

      #1 Incorporate and identify damage tolerance inspections within the maintenance program; and
      #2 Prevent airplane operation past the time limit established for obtaining damage tolerance inspections?

REFERENCES: AC-120-93, 121.1109(c)

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:48 AM, 

QID:
 00007067, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
45   
Do the procedures specify that the evaluation of repairs, for damage-tolerance-based inspections that ensure continued airworthiness, will establish:

      #1 The identification of repairs that need the development of damage tolerance data;
      #2 A schedule for implementing damage tolerance inspections for existing repairs;
      #3 New repair implementation of damage tolerant inspections; and
      #4 The need to coordinate development of damage tolerance data for structure that has been altered with the party responsible for the design of the alteration?

REFERENCES: AC-120-93, 8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 6 Sec 4

NOTE: Damage tolerance evaluations must be performed on existing as well as new repairs.

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:48 AM, 

QID:
 00007070, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
46   
Do the procedures specify that once damage tolerance inspections are known, the first inspection of the repair should be accomplished according to the following schedule:

      #1 Before the inspection threshold or within a time limit that is equivalent to a "C-check" from date of accomplishment of the damage tolerance survey, whichever occurs later; or
      #2 If the age of the repair is unknown, use the airplanes age in flight cycles or flight hours; and
      #3 Implement repetitive inspection intervals?

REFERENCES: AC-120-93, 8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 6 Sec 4

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:48 AM, 

QID:
 00007075, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
47   
Do the procedures specify the following steps to develop a list of alterations:

      #1 Compile a list of all alterations that are currently installed on the fleet;
      #2 Include in the list those alterations that affect fatigue critical structure and have since been removed (components removed) but the altered structure remains;
      #3 Delete from the list those alterations that are not installed on its current fleet;
      #4 Delete from the list those alterations that do not affect fatigue critical structure;
      #5 Review the remaining alterations to determine whether damage tolerance data already exists or needs to be developed;
      #6 Survey the aircraft to ensure all alterations have been identified; and
      #7 Submit a letter to the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office, through the Principal Maintenance Inspector, providing a list of alterations developed by a STC Holder on the certificate holders active fleet?

REFERENCES: AC-120-93, 8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 6 Sec 4

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS") ,  Rev.  4  6/25/2019 10:58:37 AM, 

QID:
 00007079, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
48   
Does the maintenance program include requirements to incorporate damage tolerance inspections for alterations within the time lines contained in the TC or STC holders compliance document?


REFERENCES: AC-120-93, 8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 6 Sec 4

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:49 AM, 

QID:
 00007087, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
49   
Does the maintenance program include, for alterations where damage tolerance inspections are not made available by TC or STC holders, requirements for submitting damage tolerance data per one or both of the following:

      #1 For alterations identified during the records review, data is to be submitted to the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office no later than December 20, 2012 or prior to the airplane reaching 75 percent of the design service goal, whichever occurs later; and
      #2 For alterations that are found during the airplane survey for repairs, data is submitted to the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office no later than 12 months from the time of discovery?

REFERENCES: AC-120-93, 8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 6 Sec 4

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS") ,  Rev.  4  6/25/2019 10:58:36 AM, 

QID:
 00007088, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
50   
Does the maintenance program include, for alterations where damage tolerance inspections are not made available by TC or STC holders, requirements for incorporation of damage tolerance inspections per one or both of the following:

      #1 For alterations identified during the records review, incorporate the inspections no later than 6 months from the date the FAA approves the data; and
      #2 For alterations that are found during the airplane survey for repairs, incorporate the inspections no later than 6 months from the date the FAA approves the data?

REFERENCES: AC-120-93, 8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 6 Sec 4

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:49 AM, 

QID:
 00007091, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
51   
Do the procedures specify alterations with a known age be implemented according to the damage tolerance schedule?


REFERENCES: AC-120-93, 8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 6 Sec 4

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:49 AM, 

QID:
 00007094, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
52   
Do the procedures specify that alterations with an unknown age implement damage tolerant inspections using the airplane age in total flight cycles or total flight hours as applicable?


REFERENCES: AC-120-93, 8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 6 Sec 4

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:49 AM, 

QID:
 00007095, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
53   
Does the CAMP require that the first alteration damage tolerant inspection for airplanes that have not met their threshold be accomplished in whichever of the following time periods occurs later:

      #1 Before the inspection threshold; or
      #2 Within a time limit equivalent to a C-check interval from incorporation of the damage tolerance inspection?

REFERENCES: AC-120-93, 8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 6 Sec 4

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:50 AM, 

QID:
 00007096, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
54   
Does the CAMP require that the first alteration damage tolerant inspection be accomplished, for airplanes which are beyond their threshold, within a time limit equivalent to a C-check interval from accomplishment of the damage tolerance evaluation for the alteration?


REFERENCES: AC-120-93, 8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 6 Sec 4

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:50 AM, 

QID:
 00007099, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
55   
Does the CAMP require the implementation of repetitive inspections as required by the damage tolerance inspection?


REFERENCES: AC-120-93, 8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 6 Sec 4

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:50 AM, 

QID:
 00007100, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
56   
Does the CAMP include a requirement that any alteration installed after December 20, 2010, that affects fatigue critical baseline structure, must have damage tolerance data that addresses the affected fatigue critical baseline structure or fatigue critical structure of the alteration?


REFERENCES: AC-120-93, 8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 6 Sec 4

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:50 AM, 

QID:
 00007101, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
57   
Does the maintenance program include procedures to report significant findings to the TC holders to ensure that prompt fleet action is taken?


REFERENCES: AC-120-93

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:50 AM, 

QID:
 00007103, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
58   
Do the procedures specify that prior to adding a leased foreign-registered airplane for use in operations under 14 CFR Part 121, the certificate holder should develop and implement an Operator Implementation Plan for the airplane?


REFERENCES: AC-120-93

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:51 AM, 

QID:
 00007109, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
59   
Do the procedures specify that when revising a maintenance program containing damage tolerance inspections for repairs and alterations affecting fatigue critical baseline structure, all revisions must be submitted through the Principal Maintenance Inspector to the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office for approval?


REFERENCES: AC-120-93

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS") ,  Rev.  4  6/25/2019 10:58:33 AM, 

QID:
 00007110, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
60   
Does the CAMP include procedures that require the certificate holder to perform a design review and develop ICAs (inspection tasks, intervals, and limitations) for field-approved auxiliary fuel tanks installed in their airplanes?


REFERENCES: AC-120-97, 121.1113(b), 8900.1 Vol 6 Ch 11 Sec 23

NOTE: Design review requirements are detailed in SFAR 88.

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (OPSPEC = "D072") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "FUEL TANK SYSTEM MAINTENANCE") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:52 AM, 

QID:
 00007170, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
61   
Does the CAMP include requirements for the certificate holder to submit proposed field-approved auxiliary tank ICA data through the Principal Inspector to the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office?


REFERENCES: AC-120-97, 121.1113(b), 8900.1 Vol 6 Ch 11 Sec 23

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (OPSPEC = "D072") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "FUEL TANK SYSTEM MAINTENANCE") ,  Rev.  4  6/25/2019 10:58:33 AM, 

QID:
 00007171, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
62   
Does the CAMP include inspections, procedures, and limitations for fuel tanks systems?


REFERENCES: AC-120-97, 121.1113(b), 8900.1 Vol 6 Ch 11 Sec 23

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "FUEL TANK SYSTEM MAINTENANCE") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:52 AM, 

QID:
 00007172, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
63   
Does the CAMP include requirements for the fuel tank system maintenance program to be based on responsible Aircraft Certification Service office approved ICAs?


REFERENCES: 121.1113(d)

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "FUEL TANK SYSTEM MAINTENANCE") ,  Rev.  4  6/25/2019 10:58:33 AM, 

QID:
 00007173, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
64   
Does the CAMP include procedures mandated by the fuel tank safety ADs to:

      #1 Accomplish design changes;
      #2 Accomplish ICAs that have been determined to fall into the Unsafe Condition category;
      #3 Adhere to critical design configuration control limitations;
      #4 Incorporate airworthiness limitation section; and
      #5 Document accomplishment using the established AD tracking system?

REFERENCES: AC-120-97, 121.1113, 121.380(a), 8900.1 Vol 6 Ch 11 Sec 23, 39.11, 39.7, 43.16, 91.403(c)

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "FUEL TANK SYSTEM MAINTENANCE") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:53 AM, 

QID:
 00007174, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
65   
Does the CAMP include procedures to ensure:

      #1 Accomplishment of the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office approved type certificate holders maintenance significant Items, which includes ICAs, that fall into the "No Unsafe" condition category, but are necessary to maintain continued airworthiness of the fuel tank system ignition prevention features; and
      #2 Incorporation of the TC holders maintenance significant items (ICAs) into the CAMP, which includes tasks and intervals, from the MRBR, maintenance implementation document, or any other document in which the TC/STC holder chooses to place the information?

REFERENCES: AC-120-97, 8900.1 Vol 6 Ch 11 Sec 23

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "FUEL TANK SYSTEM MAINTENANCE") ,  Rev.  4  6/25/2019 10:58:35 AM, 

QID:
 00007180, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
66   
Do the procedures specify that prior to returning an aircraft to service after any alteration for which fuel tank ICAs are developed, the certificate holder must incorporate the fuel tank ICAs into its maintenance or inspection program?


REFERENCES: 121.1113(e)

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "FUEL TANK SYSTEM MAINTENANCE") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:53 AM, 

QID:
 00007183, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
67   
Does the CAMP include requirements that the fuel tank system maintenance program development and any subsequent revisions be submitted to the Principal Inspector for review and approval?


REFERENCES: AC-120-97, D097, 121.1113(f), 8900.1 Vol 6 Ch 11 Sec 23

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "FUEL TANK SYSTEM MAINTENANCE") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:54 AM, 

QID:
 00007196, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
68   
Does the fuel tank system maintenance program include procedures to ensure any proposed change to airworthiness limitation items are:

      #1 Submitted through the Principal Inspector who will forward them to the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office; and
      #2 Approved by the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office?

REFERENCES: AC-120-97

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "FUEL TANK SYSTEM MAINTENANCE") ,  Rev.  4  6/25/2019 10:58:35 AM, 

QID:
 00007197, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
69   
Does the fuel tank system maintenance program include procedures to ensure that exceptional short-term extension of fuel tank system airworthiness limitations without FAA engineering approval must be approved in advance by the Principal Inspector?


REFERENCES: AC-120-97

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "FUEL TANK SYSTEM MAINTENANCE") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:54 AM, 

QID:
 00007200, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
70   
Does the fuel tank system maintenance program include procedures to ensure that after an exceptional short-term extension of a fuel tank system airworthiness limitation is used, the airworthiness limitation interval reverts back to the original interval in the maintenance program?


REFERENCES: AC-120-97

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "FUEL TANK SYSTEM MAINTENANCE") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:54 AM, 

QID:
 00007201, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
71   
Does the fuel tank system maintenance program include requirements that the certificate holder must first get approval from the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office when they want to delete or change a;

      #1 Maintenance significant items task; or
      #2 Maintenance significant items task interval?

REFERENCES: AC-120-97

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "FUEL TANK SYSTEM MAINTENANCE") ,  Rev.  4  6/25/2019 10:58:32 AM, 

QID:
 00007202, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
72   
Does the fuel tank system maintenance program include procedures to ensure FAA-approved data used in certificate holder developed shop manuals and instructions are identified as FAA-approved data?


REFERENCES: AC-120-97

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "FUEL TANK SYSTEM MAINTENANCE") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:55 AM, 

QID:
 00007205, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
73   
Does the CAMP include requirements to ensure the maintenance and inspection work force understands the new philosophical approach to fuel tank system ignition prevention?


REFERENCES: AC-120-97

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "FUEL TANK SYSTEM MAINTENANCE") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:55 AM, 

QID:
 00007206, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
74   
Does the CAMP include procedures to implement the default limit of validity from Table 1 of 121.1115(f) if not using the DAH approved by the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office?


REFERENCES: AC-120-104, 121.1115(f)

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "LIMIT OF VALIDITY") ,  Rev.  4  6/25/2019 10:58:31 AM, 

QID:
 00007208, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
75   
Does the CAMP incorporate the airworthiness limitations section with a number of cycles equal to half the number of cycles accumulated on the fatigue test article?


REFERENCES: AC-120-104, 91.403(c)

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "LIMIT OF VALIDITY") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:21 AM, 

QID:
 00007209, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
76   
Does the CAMP include requirements to stop operating the airplane if the limit of validity is not incorporated by the compliance date?


REFERENCES: AC-120-104, 121.1115(b)

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "LIMIT OF VALIDITY") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:22 AM, 

QID:
 00007210, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
77   
Does the CAMP include requirements to stop operating the airplane if the airplane reaches its limit of validity?


REFERENCES: 121.1115(d)

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "LIMIT OF VALIDITY") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:22 AM, 

QID:
 00007211, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
78   
Does the CAMP include requirements that the airworthiness limitations section must:

      #1 Be complied with;
      #2 Include an approved limit of validity; and
      #3 Be clearly distinguishable within the CAMP?

REFERENCES: AC-120-104, 121.1115(b), 121.1115(c), 91.403(c)

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "LIMIT OF VALIDITY") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:22 AM, 

QID:
 00007212, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
79   
Does the CAMP include procedures to add airplanes to its OpSpec that ensure the following:

      #1 If the airplane was previously operated under an FAA-approved maintenance program, the applicable limit of validity is incorporated into the certificate holders existing maintenance program; or
      #2 If the airplane was not previously operated under an FAA-approved maintenance program, the applicable limit of validity is incorporated into the certificate holders existing maintenance program?

REFERENCES: AC-120-104

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "LIMIT OF VALIDITY") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:22 AM, 

QID:
 00007217, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
80   
Do the procedures specify that aircraft may operate beyond the limit of validity only if the following conditions are met:

      #1 An airworthiness limitations section has been incorporated into the maintenance program that is approved under 26.23 (STC);
      #2 An extended limit of validity and any widespread fatigue damage airworthiness limitation items have been approved under 26.23 of this chapter; and
      #3 The extended limit of validity and the airworthiness limitation items pertaining to widespread fatigue damage must be clearly distinguishable within the certificate holders maintenance program?

REFERENCES: 121.1115(d)

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "LIMIT OF VALIDITY") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:23 AM, 

QID:
 00007220, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
81   
Does the CAMP include requirements for service difficulty reporting of fatigue-related structural defects include operating under an extended Limit Of Validity (LOV) including

      #1 A description, with a sketch, of the damage including crack length, orientation, location, flight cycles/hours, and condition of structure;
      #2 The results of follow-up inspections by certificate holders that identify similar problems on other airplanes in the fleet;
      #3 Findings from inspections performed during repair, modification, or replacement that identify additional similar damage sites; and
      #4 A description of adjacent repairs within the same structure?

REFERENCES: AC-120-104

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "LIMIT OF VALIDITY") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:56 AM, 

QID:
 00007224, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
82   
Does the CAMP include procedures for the reporting of fatigue-related structural defects and all suspected cases of multiple site damage and/or multiple element damage to DAHs and, if possible, provide them with the damaged structure for examination and further assessment?


REFERENCES: AC-120-104

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "LIMIT OF VALIDITY") ,  Rev.  2  1/24/2017 9:21:23 AM, 

QID:
 00007229, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
83   
Does the CAMP include procedures to ensure that upon delivery of new production aircraft with installed IMM or FRM, the certificate holder must:

      #1 Incorporate the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office approved airworthiness limitation items into the maintenance program;
      #2 Incorporate the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office approved ICAs into the maintenance program;
      #3 Submit the program to the Principal Maintenance Inspector for review; and
      #4 Have authorization in OpSpecs D097 prior to implementation and use of aircraft?

REFERENCES: AC-120-98, 119.51, 8900.1 Vol 6 Ch 11 Sec 26, 91.403(c)

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "FLAMMABILITY REDUCTION MEANS") ,  Rev.  5  6/25/2019 10:58:34 AM, 

QID:
 00007231, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
84   
Does the CAMP include requirements that installed FRM or IMM must be:

      #1 Operational; and
      #2 Cannot be deactivated?

REFERENCES: 121.1117(f), 8900.1 Vol 6 Ch 11 Sec 26

NOTE: Except per MMEL 121.628.

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "FLAMMABILITY REDUCTION MEANS") ,  Rev.  4  1/24/2017 9:21:59 AM, 

QID:
 00007265, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
85   
Do the procedures require the CAMP be revised to include the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office-approved FMR or IMM airworthiness limitations:

      #1 Prior to operation; and
      #2 Before returning an airplane to service after any alteration of the fuel tank system?

REFERENCES: 121.1117(g), 121.1117(h), 8900.1 Vol 6 Ch 11 Sec 26

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "FLAMMABILITY REDUCTION MEANS") ,  Rev.  5  6/25/2019 10:58:32 AM, 

QID:
 00007268, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
86   
Does the CAMP include requirements for the fuel tank system airworthiness limitations to include the DAH mandatory maintenance and inspection actions that:

      #1 Prevent ignition;
      #2 Ensure unsafe conditions are not introduced into the affected fuel tank that could ultimately affect the fuel tank system; and
      #3 Prevent the development of fuel tank flammability increases as a result of configuration changes, repairs, alterations, or deficiencies in the maintenance program throughout the operational life of the airplane?

REFERENCES: AC-120-98, 121.1117(h), 25.981

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "FLAMMABILITY REDUCTION MEANS") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:51 AM, 

QID:
 00007271, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
87   
Does the CAMP include requirements that the following DAH fuel tank system CDCCL incorporates:

      #1 Information necessary to maintain needed design features to preclude the development of ignition sources;
      #2 Information necessary to maintain needed design features that provide a means to minimize the development of flammable vapors;
      #3 Instructions to retain the critical flammability reduction features during configuration changes that may be caused by alterations, repairs, or maintenance actions;
      #4 Instructions that prevent the failure of critical flammability reduction features that exist in the fuel system;
      #5 The means to manage and control the configuration of the ignition source prevention features; and
      #6 Controls and process management designed to reduce flammable vapors in the airplane's fuel tank system?

REFERENCES: AC-120-98, 121.1117(h), 8900.1 Vol 6 Ch 11 Sec 26, 25.981

NOTE: CDCCL's do not have a specific task or interval associated with them. They are specific instructions that are designed to ensure that whenever maintenance actions, repairs, or design changes occur, the critical configuration is not compromised.

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "FLAMMABILITY REDUCTION MEANS") ,  Rev.  4  1/24/2017 9:22:00 AM, 

QID:
 00007275, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
88   
Do the procedures incorporate the instructions that identify required markings or placards and are properly maintained and in place throughout the operational life of the airplane?


REFERENCES: AC-120-98, 8900.1 Vol 6 Ch 11 Sec 23, 8900.1 Vol 6 Ch 11 Sec 26

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "FLAMMABILITY REDUCTION MEANS") ,  Rev.  4  1/24/2017 9:22:00 AM, 

QID:
 00007282, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
89   
Do the procedures specify that exceptional short-term extensions to FAA-approved airworthiness limitation section are prohibited?


REFERENCES: AC-120-98, 8900.1 Vol 6 Ch 11 Sec 23, 8900.1 Vol 6 Ch 11 Sec 26

NOTE: An operator may extend certain fuel system AL's up to the maximum number of days specified in the applicable Airworthiness Limitation Section (ALS) for a specific airplane without responsible Aircraft Certification Service office approval.

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "FLAMMABILITY REDUCTION MEANS") ,  Rev.  6  6/25/2019 10:58:32 AM, 

QID:
 00007283, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
90   
Does the CAMP include requirements for training individuals involved with fuel tank maintenance to ensure they understand the:

      #1 FRM or IMM installation goals;
      #2 Certificate holders philosophical approach; and
      #3 Methods of installing, maintaining, inspecting, and altering these systems?

REFERENCES: AC-120-97, AC-120-98, 8900.1 Vol 6 Ch 11 Sec 26

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "FLAMMABILITY REDUCTION MEANS") ,  Rev.  5  12/28/2021 9:33:44 AM, 

QID:
 00007284, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
91   
Did the certificate holder evaluate the impact of maintenance or inspection interval changes on the repair assessment program?


REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  3  1/24/2017 9:21:33 AM, 

QID:
 00017197, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Observable
  Not Applicable
92   
Do the procedures meet the Emergency Evacuation System (EES) program requirements contained in OpSpec D105?


REFERENCES: D105, AC-43-208, 121.309(b)

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (OPSPEC = "D105") ,  Rev.  1  1/14/2016 11:32:55 AM, 

QID:
 00049338, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
93   
Do the procedures specify that, in the evaluation of the first supplemental inspection, stage 3 will define the inspection threshold in flight cycles measured from the time of repair installation?


REFERENCES: AC-120-73

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "PRESSURIZED FUSELAGES") ,  Rev.  1  1/24/2017 9:22:11 AM, 

QID:
 00051117, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
94   
Do procedures ensure required Damage Tolerance Data, resulting from the survey, is submitted to the responsible Aircraft Certification Service office within the timeframes recommended in AC 120-93?


REFERENCES: AC-120-93, 121.1109

NOTE: The DT Data for repairs identified in an airplane survey may be approved by a FAA Designee, as coordinated with and authorized by the FAA Oversight Office. The same timelines for data approval apply.

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS") ,  Rev.  2  6/25/2019 10:58:32 AM, 

QID:
 00051132, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
95   
Do procedures exist in enough detail to meet the regulatory and guidance requirements for this element to produce the intended results?


Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") ,  Rev.  1  3/13/2018 11:30:19 AM, 

QID:
 00051912, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
96   
Do the procedures specify that prior to adding an airplane previously operated under a 14 CFR Part 121 to its OpSpecs or fleet the certificate holder must use the previous approved Operator Implementation Plan (IOP) , their existing OIP, or develop a new OIP if it involves a new airplane?


REFERENCES: AC-120-93

Safety Attribute: Procedures,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS") ,  Rev.  1  3/26/2021 1:03:39 PM, 

QID:
 00057406, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
97   
Does the CAMP include requirements for the FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector to approve the incorporation of the approved airworthiness limitation section "limit of validity" that were provided by the DAH into the maintenance program?


REFERENCES: 121.1115(e)

Safety Attribute: Controls,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") AND (MX PROGRAMS = "LIMIT OF VALIDITY") ,  Rev.  3  12/29/2020 11:23:57 AM, 

QID:
 00007216, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
  Not Applicable
98   
Do controls exist within this element that ensure risks are reduced to an acceptable level?


REFERENCES: 5.53, 5.55, 5.51

Safety Attribute: Controls,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") ,  Rev.  2  3/8/2019 12:47:45 PM, 

QID:
 00051913, Response Details: Controls ED/EP/SP DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
99   
Does the certificate holder have a method to evaluate the impact of changes on related processes (interfaces) for this element?


Safety Attribute: Interfaces,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") ,  Rev.  2  3/8/2019 12:47:45 PM, 

QID:
 00051914, Response Details: Interfaces ED/EP/SP DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
100   
Does the process design ensure the individual with responsibility provides both financial and human resources for the safety and quality performance of this element?


REFERENCES: 5.21, 5.23(a), 5.25(a), 5.25(b), 5.25(c)

Safety Attribute: Responsibility,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") ,  Rev.  2  3/8/2019 12:47:45 PM, 

QID:
 00051915, Response Details: Responsibility ED/EP/SP DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
101   
Is the person with authority clearly identifiable, qualified and knowledgeable to effectively plan, direct and control resources, change procedures and make key determinations including safety risk acceptance decisions for this element?


REFERENCES: 5.23(a), 5.23(b), 5.25(c)

Safety Attribute: Authority,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") ,  Rev.  2  3/8/2019 12:47:48 PM, 

QID:
 00051916, Response Details: Authority ED/EP/SP DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
102   
Do process measurement(s) exist to evaluate the performance of this element and implement corrective action if necessary?


REFERENCES: 5.71, 5.73, 5.75

Safety Attribute: Process Measurement,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") ,  Rev.  2  3/8/2019 12:47:48 PM, 

QID:
 00051917, Response Details: Process Measurement ED/EP/SP DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No
103   
Does the process design require that individuals understand their safety role and how it contributes to the safety performance of this element?


REFERENCES: 5.23(a), 5.91, 5.93

Safety Attribute: Safety Ownership,  Question Type: Output Validation,  

Scoping Attribute:
  (FAR PART = "121") ,  Rev.  2  3/8/2019 12:47:46 PM, 

QID:
 00051918, Response Details: Safety Ownership ED/EP/SP DCTs (Both OP and AW),  Status: Released

  Yes
  No


Response Details List  Authority ED/EP/SP DCTs (Both OP and AW) (Released, 1.0)
1 Process oversight failure
2 Unacceptable safety risk acceptance
3 Ineffective planning of resources
4 Ineffective use of resources
5 Ineffective control of resources
6 Failure to implement safety risk processes
7 Process owner not clearly identified
8 Unqualified
9 Other
Response Details List  Controls ED/EP/SP DCTs (Both OP and AW) (Released, 1.0)
1 Failure to identify hazards or ineffective risk controls
2 Failure to develop and maintain risk controls
3 Failure to effectively mitigate risk before applying risk controls
4 Risk controls ineffective
5 Unclear risk controls
6 Failure to assess risk for a new system
7 Failure to assess risk when revising an existing system
8 Failure to assess risk when developing operational procedures
9 Failure to maintain records of outputs of risk control assessments
10 Other
Response Details List  EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW) (Released, 1.0)
1 Unclear procedure(s)
2 Conflicting procedure(s)
3 Used workaround(s)
4 Skipped process step(s)
5 Personnel failed to follow process (procedures, guidance, etc)
6 Procedures/guidance not available
7 Procedures/guidance not current
8 Inconsistent procedure(s)
9 Undocumented procedure(s)
10 Minor typographical error(s) (i.e. record entries)
11 Information missing
12 Communication failure(s)
13 Personnel failed to perform task
14 Process failed to meet desired outcome
15 Process oversight failure
16 Equipment/tools not available
17 Equipment/tools not adequate
18 Equipment/tools not calibrated
19 Facilities not adequate
20 Other
Response Details List  Interfaces ED/EP/SP DCTs (Both OP and AW) (Released, 1.0)
1 Internal communication failure(s)
2 External communication failure(s)
3 Lack of interfaces
4 Inconsistent interfaces
5 Poor coordination between departments and employees
6 Failure of interfaces between processes or procedures
7 Other
Response Details List  Process Measurement ED/EP/SP DCTs (Both OP and AW) (Released, 1.0)
1 Inadequate monitoring of operations processes
2 Ineffective evaluations of processes or systems
3 Undocumented or insufficient investigations
4 Failure to conduct audits
5 Ineffective audits
6 Failure to detect changes in the operational environment
7 Personnel failed to perform/follow process (procedures, guidance, etc.)
8 Process failed to meet desired outcome
9 Process oversight failure
10 Other
Response Details List  Responsibility ED/EP/SP DCTs (Both OP and AW) (Released, 1.0)
1 Failed to provide financial resources
2 Failed to provide sufficient human resources
3 Individual not clearly identified
4 Failure to ensure safety of process
5 Failure to oversee operations conducted under the certificate
6 Failed to ensure quality performance of process
7 Process oversight failure
8 Communication failure(s)
9 Other
Response Details List  N/A Response Detail (Released, 2.0)
1 Not applicable or authorized for the certificate holder or applicant
2 Other
Response Details List  N/O Response Detail (Released, 2.0)
1 Personnel (e.g., key certificate holder personnel not present/available)
2 Equipment (e.g., equipment not present/available/in serviceable condition)
3 Event did not occur (e.g., did not observe an intoxicated passenger on the flight)
4 Time Constraints (e.g., resources/workload)
5 Weather (e.g., weather needed for observation not present or weather made observation impossible)
6 Other
Response Details List  Safety Ownership ED/EP/SP DCTs (Both OP and AW) (Released, 3.0)
1 Unaware of or ineffective safety policies or processes
2 Unaware of or ineffective safety related reporting tools
3 Unclear safety policy
4 Ineffective safety related training
5 Lack of safety culture
6 Unclear safety objectives
7 Other